International Association
for Advancing Higher Education
This review form is designed and optimized for devices with screen sizes of 1280 and higher in landscape orientation with zero zoom. Please use a compatible device in the appropriate configuration in your review.
IAAHE Scoring Rubrics > Student-Centered Teaching
Institutional Information
Name of Institution:
City:
State / Province / Prefecture:
Country:
Institutional Characteristics:
• Type of Institution:
• Enrollment Size:
• Educational Orientation:
• Program Range:
• Degree / Diploma Level:
Undergraduate Programs
Graduate Programs
Name of Reviewer:
Data of Review:
// End of Institutional Information
Scoring Rubrics: Student-Centered Teaching
Do the institution’s faculty incorporate student-centered teaching (SCT) methods into their courses / modules?
• Metrics and Marks Allocations
• Review of Institutional Information
• Scoring Rubric for Metric 1 > Range of Student-Centered Teaching (SCT) Methods Employed
• Scoring Rubric for Metric 2 > Extent of Student-Centered Teaching in the Curriculum
• Scoring Rubric for Metric 3 > Student Evaluations of the Effectiveness of Student-Centered Teaching Methods
• Review of Uploaded Evidence
• Total Score Sheet
• Notifications to Institution
// End of Contents
Metrics and Marks Allocations
Total Possible Marks: 80
Metric 1 > Range of Student-Centered Teaching (SCT) Methods Employed
Max Score / 20 Marks
Max Score / 20 Marks
Metric 2 > Extent of Incorporation of Student-Centered Teaching into Curriculum
Max Score / 20 Marks
Max Score / 20 Marks
Metric 3 > Student Evaluations of the Effectiveness of Student-Centered Teaching Methods
Max Score / 40 Marks
Max Score / 40 Marks
// End of Allocations Sheet
Review of Institutional Information
Does the institutional information reported in the data sheet align with the information that we have on record for the institution? If so, please tick the first checkbox in the section below. If not, please tick the second checkbox and all of the relevant checkboxes for the areas in which there are discrepancies, and notify a supervisor.
All institutional information aligns with what we have on record.
The institutional information reported in the data sheet does not align with what we have on record.
There are issues or problems with the following institutional characteristics
Name of Institution
City
State / Province / Prefecture
Country
Type of Institution
Enrollment Size
Educational Orientation
Program Range
Degree / Diploma Level
Undergraduate Programs
Graduate Programs
// End of Review of Institutional Information
Scoring Rubric for Metric 1 > Range of Student-Centered Teaching (SCT) Methods Employed
Did the institution provide / identify the correct types of data and evidence for Metric 1 as specified in the data sheet? If so, please tick the first checkbox In the section below. If not, please tick the second checkbox and all of the relevant checkboxes relating to the areas for which incorrect types of data / evidence were submitted / identified, and notify a supervisor.
All types of data and evidence provided / identified for Metric 1 are appropriate.
Not all types of data and evidence provided / identified for Metric 1 are appropriate.
There are issues or problems in the following areas:
Extent of faculty usage of student-centered teaching (SCT) methods: percentage of faculty who employ each SCT method in at least one of their courses / modules
Supporting evidence of faculty usage of student-centered teaching (SCT) methods: course syllabi, assignments, or other types of handouts, etc.
Based upon your review of all supplemental data and supporting evidence for Metric 1, are the institution’s data credible and consistent? If so, please tick the first checkbox in the section below. If not, please tick the second checkbox and notify a supervisor.
The institution’s supplemental data and supporting evidence are credible and consistent.
Not all supplemental data and supporting evidence are credible and consistent. The data and/or evidence for which issues were found are identified and described in the section below:
If the institution provided / identified the correct types of data and evidence for Metric 1, and its supplemental data and supporting evidence are credible and consistent, please determine the institution’s score for Metric 1 using the scoring rubric in the section below.
Scoring Rubric for Metric 1
Max Score: 20 Marks
Number of SCT Methods Employed (X)
Score (Y)
6 or more
20
1-5
Y = Score = 3.333X
0
0
Graph of Scoring Rubric for Metric 1
Number of SCT Methods Employed
Score Calculator
Number of SCT Methods Employed
Score
// End of Scoring Rubric for Metric 1
Scoring Rubric for Metric 2 > Extent of Student-Centered Teaching in the Curriculum
Did the institution provide a proper percentage for Metric 2 as specified in the data sheet? If so, please tick the first checkbox. If not, please tick the second checkbox and notify a supervisor.
The institution provided a proper percentage for Metric 2.
The institution did not provide a proper percentage for Metric 2.
Based upon your review of all supplemental data and supporting evidence for Metric 2, are the institution’s data credible and consistent? If so, please tick the first checkbox in the section below. If not, please tick the second checkbox and notify a supervisor.
The institution’s supplemental data and supporting evidence are credible and consistent.
Not all supplemental data and supporting evidence are credible and consistent. The data and/or evidence for which issues were found are identified and described in the section below:
If the institution provided a proper percentage for Metric 2 and its supplemental data and supporting evidence are credible and consistent, please determine the institution’s score for Metric 2 using the scoring rubric in the section below.
Scoring Rubric for Metric 2
Max Score: 20 Marks
Percentage of Courses / Modules that Incorporate SCT Methods (X)
Score (Y)
90-100%
20
40-89.9%
Y = Score = 0.222X
0-39.9%
0
Graph of Scoring Rubric for Metric 2
Percentage of Courses / Modules that Incorporate SCT Methods
Score Calculator
Percentage of Courses / Modules that Incorporate SCT Methods
Score
// End of Scoring Rubric for Metric 2
Scoring Rubric for Metric 3 > Student Evaluations of the Effectiveness of Student-Centered Teaching Methods
If the institution provided results of the student survey on the effectiveness of student-centered teaching methods, please determine the institution’s score for Metric 3 using the scoring rubric in the section below.
Scoring Rubric for Metric 3
Max Score: 40 Marks
Percentage of Students Who Responded ‘Excellent’ to the Survey Item – The Overall Effectiveness of the Student-Centered Teaching Methods Employed by Faculty (X)
Score (Y)
80-100%
40
50-79.9%
Y = Score = 0.5X
0-49.9%
0
Graph of Scoring Rubric for Metric 3
Percentage of Students Who Responded ‘Excellent’ to the Survey Item –
The Overall Effectiveness of the Student-Centered Teaching Methods Employed by Faculty
The Overall Effectiveness of the Student-Centered Teaching Methods Employed by Faculty
Score Calculator
Percentage of Students Who Responded ‘Excellent’ to the Survey Item – The Overall Effectiveness of the Student-Centered Teaching Methods Employed by Faculty
Score
// End of Scoring Rubric for Metric 3
Review of Uploaded Evidence
For each of the SCT methods that faculty employ, (1) did the institution upload course syllabi, assignments, or other types of handouts for two separate courses / modules from different degree / diploma programs in different disciplinary fields and (2) were those degree / diploma programs different than those for other SCT methods that faculty employ? If so, please tick the first checkbox in the section below. If not, please tick the second checkbox and all of the relevant checkboxes for the SCT methods for which there are discrepancies, and notify a supervisor.
All uploaded evidence is appropriate.
Not all uploaded evidence is appropriate.
There are issues or problems with the following SCT methods:
Case studies
Concept mapping
Digital storytelling
Flipped classrooms
Game-based learning
Gamification of learning
Interactive demonstrations
Peer instruction
Problem-based teaching
Project-based learning
Reverse problem solving
Role playing
Tutorial worksheets
Other SCT methods
Based upon your review of all uploaded evidence for Metric 1, is the institution’s evidence credible and consistent? If so, please tick the first checkbox in the section below. If not, please tick the second checkbox, identify and describe the issues that you found in the space provided, and notify a supervisor.
All of the institution’s uploaded evidence is credible and consistent.
Not all uploaded evidence is credible and consistent. The evidence for which issues were found are identified and described in the section below:
Did the institution submit comments with its data sheet? If not, please tick the first checkbox in the section below. If so, please tick the second checkbox, include the comments in the space provided, and notify a supervisor.
The institution did not submit any comments with its data sheet
The institution’s comments are provided in the section below:
// End of Review of Uploaded Evidence
Total Score Sheet
Metrics
Score (Marks)
Metric 1: Range of Student-Centered Teaching (SCT) Methods Employed
(Max Score: 20 Marks)
(Max Score: 20 Marks)
Metric 2: Extent of Incorporation of Student-Centered Teaching into Curriculum
(Max Score: 20 Marks)
(Max Score: 20 Marks)
Metric 3: Student Evaluations of the Effectiveness of Student-Centered Teaching Methods
(Max Score: 40 Marks)
(Max Score: 40 Marks)
Total Score
// End of Total Score Sheet
Notifications to Institution
In your review of the institution’s data sheet, did your findings indicate that: (1) the institutional information reported in the data sheet aligns with the information that we have on record for the institution, (2) the institution provided the correct types of data and evidence for the SCT metrics, and (3) the institution uploaded the appropriate evidence for all SCT methods that faculty employ? If so, please tick the first checkbox in the section below and send an email notification to the institution that indicates that its data sheet is appropriately completed and has been accepted for scoring. If not, please tick the second checkbox and send an email notification to the institution that identifies and describes the issues / problems that you found.
All information, data, and evidence that the institution submitted are appropriate.
Not all information, data, or evidence that the institution submitted are appropriate.
There are issues or problems with the following review areas:
Institutional Information
Metric 1
Metric 2
Metric 3
Uploaded Evidence
// End of Notifications
// End of Form / IAAHE Scoring Rubrics > Student-Centered Teaching
World Headquarters